Search This Blog

Sunday, December 19, 2010

The Christmas Story: The Birth of Christ/ His Preexistence

An updated and more complete version of these lessons on the Birth of Christ may be found here: http://birthandlifeofchrist.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/5/

Outline
A.     Introduction
B.     Prophecy
C.     Preexistence
D.     Genealogy
1.                  Matthew
2.                  Luke

C. Our Lord’s Preexistence.  

The following verses we study will also further define what is meant by “long ago” and “days of eternity.”  We will study John 1:1-2.  In this entire passage, of which we’ll only study the first two verses, John establishes both the deity of Jesus Christ in the flesh and His existence before His Incarnation.  John also shows how Jesus, as the Word, was intimately related to the Father as an equal in essence.  He used the term, “the Word,” λόγος HO LOGOS to describe our Lord.  It was a highly charged word in that current Greek vernacular, through, as we will study, he brought new meaning to it.  This Word or Logos was entirely new, superior and greater than any other having existed.  This Logos is personal God!
   He begins the verse with the simple phrase ἐν ἀρχή EN ARCHE which, in this context, is translated “In the beginning.” There is actually no definite article in the Greek, so this is an anarthrous construction. In the Greek, the omission of the definite article has meaning, indicating quality, in this case the highest quality.  We add the definite article in the English translation for a smoother English reading.  When you add the next word, the imperfect active indicative of εἰμί EIMI, a verb of absolute status quo, it indicates that this beginning wasn’t a beginning at all. The imperfect tense, because it indicates linear aktionsart in past time, portrays this state of being as occurring in the past with no indication that the action is ever completed.[1] Yet, the noun, “beginning” indicates by definition of very definite point of time.  Therefore, these words speak of eternity, which is in the past, as far as we’re concerned because we life in time.  This is language of accommodation for us.  
Time, which we live in, is a part of God’s creation.  He is outside of time.  He invented time.  So this phrase describes a definite status quo outside of time.  This verse teaches that object existed eternally before God created time. Furthermore “the imperfect tense of the verb εἰμί EIMI refers to an absolute status quo, to exist eternally. In other words, this verb “was” is saying in effect that Jesus Christ is God. The word “was” indicates eternal life, and anyone who pre-existed eternal life is God.  An interpretive translation, which I have borrowed from RB Thieme, Jr, is “In the beginning which was not a beginning was…”
The next two words form the object “in the beginning was.”  Those two words are the definite article HO with λόγος  LOGOS, translated, “the Word.”  How do we know that “the Word” refers to Jesus Christ?  Where did this title come from?  What does it mean when we talk about our Lord?  Let’s take some time to answer these questions. Again, giving credit to whom credit is due: my thanks to RB Thieme Jr. for this analysis.  “This is the first title used for the Lord Jesus Christ as the eternally existent One. This word, LOGOS was a technical word in Greek philosophy; a term often used for infinity. It was used to indicate the Supreme Mover, the one who was behind everyone, the one who brings order into the human race. The word is also used in different contexts throughout the New Testament for the Lord Jesus Christ.  John personalized this highly charged Greek technical term in Jesus Christ.
As an example of another use of LOGOS, in Colossians 1:18 we have a phrase, “the Word of the Cross.”
For the Word of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God. 1 Corinthians 1:18
The Greek says, “the Logos of the Cross.” The cross was the lowliest, meanest, most demeaning thing to come out of the Roman Empire. The most disgraceful and humiliating death that anyone could die was crucifixion. So the cross was the lowest and the LOGOS, the highest; Jesus Christ is called the LOGOS of the Cross. In other words, the One who went to the cross was not only true humanity who was humiliated for us, but He is also eternal God.
HO LOGOS connotes three things:
1. The first principle behind the use of this Greek word is revelation. Jesus Christ is the visible expression of the world of the invisible. He is the revelation of God the Father whose substance or essence is invisible.  Jesus Christ is the visible manifestation of the Godhead.  According to Hebrews 1:1-3, Jesus Christ is the only member of the Godhead who is ever revealed.  We only understand the Godhead by means of Him.  Jesus Christ, the revealed member of the Godhead had to become a human in order to be seen.  The LOGOS is the only visible member of the Godhead because He took upon Himself the form of man.  Now perhaps I should put this into the past tense because He is not on the earth now, though He is still in the form of glorified man.  The New Testament records the accounts of witnesses who saw Him revealed.  That He revealed Himself is not only a matter of historical record but that He is to come again.
2. The second connotation of the word LOGOS is the communication of intelligent thought. In order to think you must have a vocabulary: words. You cannot think without words.  Since LOGOS means “word,” it refers to the organization of words into thought. It takes a vocabulary to develop concepts and categories and principles of doctrine.  He has communicated to us, though both the Written Word and through the Spirit, His thinking. 1 Corinthians 2:16 the Bible is called “the mind of Christ.”
The third concept of LOGOS is order; putting design and purpose into all things. Jesus Christ is the designer of the dispensations, therefore the designer of history. He is the designer of the plan in which you find yourself. The very plan which He has provided is a plan of order and design.
Now, let us return to the study of John 1:1.
So the imperfect tense of the absolute status quo verb, EIMI indicates eternity and with the next two words, the eternally-existent one. Here is one who always existed and will always exist. Many grammars, commentaries and other writings abound with grammatical and syntactical reasons why this phrase indicates our Lord’s deity, indicated by His preexistence.  For our purposes here, we need not go further than John’s purpose for writing the book, the overall context, to understand that this passage indicates His preexistence as the Second Person of the Trinity.  So, an interpretive translation of the verse so far reads this way: “In eternity, outside of time, the Word existed.”
The verse continues with these words: “and the Word was with God.”  “The Word,” refers our Lord who preexisted time.  “Was” is again, the same verb in the same form as before, indicating eternal absolute status.  “With” is the preposition πρός  PROS.  This translation, “with,” is just not sufficient however, to express the Greek idiomatic meaning.  Much better is “face to face with,” because this communicates an intimacy with God not indicated by “with.”  For Him to be face to face with God indicates intimate eternality.
The last phrase in John 1:1, “and the Word was God.” doesn’t quite do justice to the original Greek.  Whenever an English translation doesn’t do justice to the Greek, false doctrines abound because of misunderstandings which result.  Let us straighten this out! Again, the word, “was” is in the imperfect tense, linear aktionsart indicating the absolute status quo of something in past time, as far as we are concerned.  Remember that God preexists time. It should read, “and God kept on being the Word” or “God was the Word.”  In other words, Jesus Christ always was and will always be God; there never will be a time when He isn’t God.
He preexisted His being in Hypostatic Union as the second member of the Godhead.  The term, Hypostatic Union, describes our Lord Jesus Christ as being completely human and undiminished Deity.  It comes from the Greek word, ὑπόστασις HUPOSTASIS. 
So to sum up what John has communicated to us through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit: John  takes us beyond time – “in the beginning” takes us from time into eternity. In eternity, the LOGOS manifests God. Remember, eternity is outside of time, without past, present or future.  The LOGOS is the second person of the Trinity who was always face to face, intimate with God and Spirit because He is God.  God was always the LOGOS. The last two phrases emphasize that we are dealing with the Lord Jesus Christ, the subject of this entire Gospel. The story of His humanity must always be understood from the perspective of His preexistent Deity, and, to introduce another facet of His preexistence, His being the God of the Old Testament.
“This second verse further emphasizes His essence. “The same” is literally “the same one.” “The same one kept on existing in the beginning [in eternity] face to face with God.” The word “with” is PROS plus the accusative again and it should be translated “face to face with God.” This emphasizes His deity. Jesus Christ is God.”  Thieme, R. Thieme's Gospel of John.
Paul, when writing to the Philippian believers addressed the subject of Christ before His First Advent and His attributes of Deity.  This is Philippians 2:6:
“…who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped,” Philippians 2:6
Only the first phrase of this verse is germane to our subject, the preexistence of Christ. We will limit our discussion is this lesson to the phrase: “…He existed in the form of God...”  The rest of this verse and verses following teach the doctrine of Kenosis, which we will teach at another time.  Using the Greek word order, the phrase, “in the form of God” comes first. The first word in the Greek word order is the preposition, ἕν EN, meaning “in.” It precedes a noun, as we will see in a minute, in the locative of sphere.  Next is in the Greek word order is μορφή MORPHE, translated “form.” This word is not preceded by a definite article (anarthrous), as we would expect.  The lack of a definite article in the Greek indicates greatness of quality of the quality of this form.  Of course we are speaking of the form of the 2nd member of the Trinity before He took on humanity.  Our Lord, before the incarnation, possessed the entire essence of God.  He was eternal God.  There is no greater quality possible.  This word “formed” is defined by the next word, θεός THEOS in the possessive genitive singular, God.  So this form refers to the totality of the divine essence.
The essence of Jesus Christ before the incarnation is the essence of God. He was, is, always will be eternal God, therefore He shared, and continues to share every attribute of deity with the Father and the Spirit. MORPHE, in this context, then, does not refer to the visible shape of an object.  God has no physical, outward shape, because He is Spirit.  This refers to the essence of a person, in this case, God.  So it refers to the entire essence of the Godhead.  So this again teaches that Jesus was and still is, divine.  Our Lord possessed, and still does, the entire essence of God.  THEOS is not preceded by a definite article (anarthrous), denoting, again, the highest quality possible.
Next in the Greek word order is ὑπάρχω HUPARKO, often translated as, “to be, to exist or to be identical.” This is the present active participle of the verb. Though this is a present participle, we translate the participle as a concessive, in order for the following verses to be translated correctly.  Changing this to a causal participle would render translations as being contradictory with the overall context and message of the chapter.  So, without going into a lot of grammar and syntax, we are going to translate this participle as “exist.”  Because we are speaking of Jesus Christ’s eternally existing as the identical essence of God, we will translate it as a past tense, “preexist.”  That past tense specifically referring to eternity before our Lord created universe and renovated the earth for human habitation.  He existed then as the exact image of the essence of God, existed as a human being in hypostatic union as the exact image of God, and now continues to exist as the exact image of God, in hypostatic union, seated at the right hand of the Father. “[Jesus Christ] who though he preexisted” is the corrected translation.
Daniel B. Wallace. (1999; 2002). Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics - Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament (634). Zondervan Publishing House and Galaxie Software.
These few verses we’ve looked are not the only passages which teach our Lord’s preexistence, nor do they reflect the entirety of subjects which deal with our Lord’s preexistence.  We have not looked at His being the God of the Old Testament, His appearances as Theophanies or Christophanies, nor to His preexistent work.  In this lesson we’ve but introduced this truth!  Now, let us turn to our next subject, His human genealogy.



[1] Heiser, M. S. (2005; 2005). Glossary of Morpho-Syntactic Database Terminology. Logos Bible Software.


Sunday, December 12, 2010

The Christmas Story: The Birth of Christ/ Introduction & Prophecy


An updated and more complete version of these lessons on the Birth of Christ may be found here: http://birthandlifeofchrist.wordpress.com/2011/11/21/5/

Outline
A.     Introduction
B.     Prophecy
C.     Preexistence
D.     Genealogy
1.                  Matthew
2.                  Luke

A. Introduction
Before we begin the narrative of our Lord’s birth and the surrounding events, we need to establish a context for His arrival into the human race. First, we will do this by looking at several prophecies of His birth. His entire life, including His birth and purpose of the Incarnation, was the subject of prophecy from the very beginnings of human history. Secondly, we will establish that He pre-existed His humanity as the Second Person of the Trinity. Third, we will look at His human genealogy. In this study of His genealogy, we will establish its importance. Before we study the narrative of His birth, we will also look at the prophecies which immediately preceded His birth, the angelic annunciations to Zacharias, Mary, and Joseph.
Another point of introduction deals with the nature of these lessons. They are a work in progress. I first taught, in a very compressed manner, this entire series on one Sunday morning, in two hours. I have expanded it to the point that it took 6 weeks to teach to my kids. Every year I expand the study due to new research I have done or due to other passages that have come to my attention since the previous year's study. So, coming back to the study from time to time may be beneficial to you, the reader

B. Prophecy

Genesis 3:15
And I will put enmity [hostility, antagonism] between you [Satan] and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; He shall crush you on the head, and you shall strike Him on the heel.
God saw to it that our Lord and His then-future work on the cross be revealed to humanity many centuries before He was born into this world. No prophecy spelled out every detail of our Lord’s saving work, but each progressively revealed more information. At the very least, every generation has known that God provided a Savior and that faith in Him meant the gaining of salvation. Even “faith in Him” has taken different forms during different eras in history. Salvation has been and is available to every member of humanity, no matter what time period of history, no matter what geological area, they live in.
Theologically, this verse is called the Proto-Evangelion, the first presentation of the gospel of Jesus Christ. It came from the mouth of the Lord Himself to Satan through the serpent but obviously intended for Adam and Eve’s ears as well. They heard this message just after they had understood the reality of the consequences of their sin yet before they received their punishments. Our Lord gave them the gospel so that they would have the opportunity to believe in Him and live as believers, guaranteed eternal life before they left the Garden. This promise, also our Lord’s declaration of Satan’s defeat, served as the gospel message to Adam and Eve. So, as He punished the serpent and declared to Satan the fact and mechanics of his defeat, He gave this promise of salvation to Adam and Eve before their punishment. God preceded their punishment with the promise of redemption.
The immediate context of this verse, then, is punishment to the serpent, who was Satan, and to Adam and Eve after the first sin. It is a break in the punishments God meted out to the serpent, Satan, and to Adam and Eve. Understand that though the Genesis 3:15 is seemingly addressed to the serpent, it is directed to Satan, who indwelled it. How do we know the address is actually to Satan? In Revelation 12:9 Satan is called, personified as “the serpent of old…”
And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.  Revelation 12:9

And he laid hold of the dragon, the serpent of old, who is the devil and Satan, and bound him for a thousand years; Revelation 20:2
Readers of this first gospel presentation to Adam and his wife do not often see this as a gospel message, faith in which provides eternal life. Therefore, we need to get a better understanding of what the verse teaches, that which constitutes the gospel, as well as the mechanics of the faith that God made effective for their salvation. This initial faith must be contrasted with the faith that characterizes the life of spiritual growth for the believer.
The first issue deals with how this phrase, “He shall bruise you on the head,” constitutes the gospel. We will talk about the vocabulary and grammar of this verse later in this document for a full explanation of its meaning, but briefly, it is an announcement of the fact that our Lord would defeat Satan. He had deceived Eve, leading both her and Adam into sin. Satan, for all practical purposes, had deceived Eve to the point of her soul death. For this egregious sin and for his decision to become arrogant, that is his fall, our Lord would “bruise his head.”
If Adam and Eve believed that announcement, then God would make that effective for their salvation. They need no more information to be saved, as far as the Scripture tells us. God took that belief in the salvation He would provide, as little as the proverbial mustard seed, and made that effective for salvation. God would provide more information for them, progressively, fulfilling the requirements for their spiritual growth. So, this second issue, the faith that leads to salvation, is based upon knowledge of our Lord’s person and work. Today, people are saved if they understand that Jesus Christ died for their sins, then was resurrected, defeating death that Satan introduced. Adam and Eve probably did not even know about His resurrection at that time, though He may have revealed that later as a doctrine which resulted in their spiritual growth.
Faith which results in the believer’s spiritual growth is far more complex than that which results in regeneration. Take, for instance, the numerous doctrines we recall during the communion service, those which relate to our salvation: reconciliation, justification, imputation, unlimited atonement, propitiation, redemption, and sanctification. Do we need to understand these to be saved? No, we do not. These doctrines give us a total understanding of our salvation that goes far beyond the gospel understanding we need for salvation. However, do we need knowledge of these doctrines to grow up spiritually? Absolutely! Do we need to put forth effort in order to learn and understand these doctrines? Absolutely! For us to grow up spiritually, these doctrines must coalesce in our soul, becoming a part of our system of thinking. In both cases, God the Holy Spirit teaches us both categories of doctrine; the Gospel and doctrines upon which to grow spiritually. Therefore, we can take no credit for learning either category, however, the second category demands the greater application of faith, of perseverance of faith, than the first category. If you believe something you are told, you assimilate it into your thinking as true, then, on some level, you act upon it.
Note that in the immediate context of this passage, God presented His grace solution for their spiritual death before He punished them. God’s grace always precedes punishment. He always offers grace before He curses or punishes. In this verse, He announced salvation by grace before He punished Adam and the woman as taught in Genesis 3:16-19. There is no offer of salvation for Satan, only the declaration of his final defeat; having his head crushed. This declaration was tantamount to Satan’s judgment, his sentence for his egregious sin.
The Scripture, for the most part, is silent about Satan’s progression into evil and the consequences of each sin-step. As we have noted in the Anatomy of a Sin study, sin is progressive with God providing opportunities for changing our thinking, to prevent us from sinning. When Satan became arrogant, taking a third of the angels with him, God ejected him from His throne room. He was fired! This resulted in the angelic war. Could Satan have recovered? He then brought humanity into the war by soul-murdering Eve, opening the door for Adam’s spiritual death as well. The spiritual murder, resulting in humanity’s fall, may have been the last straw for Satan, having crossed the last line, resulting in his head being crushed.
God then, offered salvation to Adam and Eve, but not to Satan. Salvation for the serpent; of all nature, I’m assuming, and for the entire animal kingdom as well, comes at the Millennium. The serpent itself may recover its pre-fall form, but Satan will be punished.
The first issue in this promise of salvation, presented in the first sentence of this verse, is the separation and antagonism between the serpent’s seed, which is also Satan’s seed, those under spiritual death, and the woman’s seed, Jesus Christ. Their “seed” refers to their descendants. Up to this time, the war between Satan and God had not included people. Now, because Satan introduced sin into humanity, this angelic conflict took on another dimension. God did not state this as a divine decree, announcing this enmity as a divine command, but defined a new line of demarcation or front line of battle, as it were, in this age-old war.
The reference to the woman’s “seed” is a prophecy of the virgin pregnancy and virgin birth of Jesus Christ. A descendant of the woman, not man and woman would defeat Satan. So, this refers to the entrance of the God-Man into human history. Our Lord is called the “woman’s seed” because He came into the world directly through the woman, without a human father involved. The “Seed of the Woman” is the first title of Christ. He was born from the Virgin Mary who was made pregnant because the Holy Spirit supplied the necessary chromosomes. The woman’s ovum, at the time of fertilization, is without corruption from the old sin nature; hence the importance of the virgin pregnancy. Our Lord had to be born perfect, without contamination from the old sin nature in order to fulfill His ministry of our salvation. This is also a prophecy about the new Tree of Life, the cross of Christ, in contrast to the one in the Garden, from which they were soon to be expelled.
Why is there this hostility between Satan’s seed, human beings who are always born spiritually dead and the Seed of the Woman? When Satan appealed God’s sentence (Matthew 25:41), in which he would be thrown into the Lake of Fire for his sin of arrogance, the battle line was drawn. All of those born imperfect are immediately hostile to and in opposition to God’s perfect righteousness.
Through this verse, God also set the barriers for hostility in the next phase of the angelic war. Until Satan is finally subjected to his sentence, this hostility will always exist in this devil’s world. Satan has actually two seeds: all fallen angels and unsaved people. Many unsaved people perpetuate their spiritual death until physical death, from which there is no salvation. The Seed of the Woman will redeem one category of Satan’s seed; people who were born spiritually dead. When anyone believes in Christ, he becomes the seed of Christ.
In the next line of this verse, we are presented with the mechanics of Satan’s defeat and the content of the gospel for Adam and Eve. Though faith is not mentioned, per se, the faith mechanic involves believing the message presented.
I’ll read the next line then expand it with some explanations.
He shall crush you on the head and you shall strike Him on the heel.
As we mentioned before, “He” is the “Seed of the Woman,” Jesus Christ. Every woman is born with cells which are uncontaminated by spiritual death. These are her ovum. These cells only become contaminated when fertilized by the male sperm, resulting in spiritually dead offspring. Since God the Holy Spirit supplied the necessary chromosomes, our Lord was born without that contamination that afflicts every other human being.
The next two important words, “crush” and “strike” are translations from the same Hebrew word, SHUPH שׁוּף in the same form. The only exception in the verb forms deals with the built-in subjects, “he” and “you.” Why then, do we translate the same word differently? The answer lies in the principle that the context and use of a word determines its meaning. The grammarian Gesenius taught this principle. We can understand from the context of each use, that the given translations are appropriate and accurate. The first use translated “crush” SHUPH שׁוּף, in the 3rd person masculine singular, qal imperfect designates our Lord’s victory in the angelic war. The creature our Lord will crush is Satan. Our Lord, when His victory is complete, will have defeated Satan twice. He dealt him the first defeat at the First Advent when He bore the imputation and judgment for the sins of the world. Satan’s second and final defeat occurs both at the beginning and end of the Millennium. At our Lord’s return, He will imprison him for 1000 years, and then at the end, He will throw him into the Lake of Fire. So, the crushing of the serpent’s head is the declaration of our Lord’s victory over Satan in His two advents.
The second use of SHUPH שׁוּף, the 2nd person masculine, qal imperfect, translated “strike,” has Satan as the subject. His striking of our Lord’s heel refers both to the fact that he introduced the venom of sin into the world, of which He bore both the imputation and punishment, ultimately withdrawing that venom. It also refers to the physical abuse our Lord bore prior to and on the cross. Our Lord necessarily suffered death for us, paying for the sins of the world. Satan introduced the concept of sin into humanity; our Lord was stricken with sin. Human volition took Satan's introduction of it and ran with it, thanks to spiritual death that resulted from the original sin. So, by sin, our Lord was struck, as if from that serpent of old. Note that crushing a serpent’s head is always fatal, whereas, a strike on the heel, even a venomous strike, is not necessarily fatal. Our Lord was injured, but not fatally on the heel.

Though our Lord punished Adam and his wife and expelled them from the Garden of Eden, this discipline lasting to this day, they believed our Lord’s message of their deliverance. 
Isaiah 7:14
Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel.  

Chronologically, this is Isaiah’s first Messianic prophecy.  The first word in the sign the Lord gave is “Behold!”  This is the Hebrew verb, HENNEH הנה, meaning “look!” calls special attention to what is about to be presented.  To really appreciate this word, we need to look at the context of this verse.  Why was Isaiah, in an almost exasperated way, saying, “Look!”  He was forcefully addressing, probably not merely speaking to, Ahaz, the King of Judah, who was facing an invasion by an alliance between the ten Northern Tribes, known as Ephriam, and Syria.  They’d wanted him to ally himself with them against Assyria.  However, Ahaz was already secretly allied with Assyria.  Isaiah had already instructed him to follow the Lord’s guidance and provision for safety, and not to depend upon treaties with other nations.  Isaiah was encouraging Ahaz to ask for a sign that would confirm the validity of Isaiah’s instructions and prophecies.  Ahaz refused, so, Isaiah forced the sign upon him. 
I had always visualized Isaiah addressing Ahaz in a fairly formal setting when he gave this sign to him, perhaps a formal address in the throne room.  However, Ahaz was in the city waterworks, trying to fix a local plumbing problem related to a clogged water supply into Jerusalem.  Water is an important issue when two armies are camped at your doorstep!  King Ahaz called Isaiah to meet him in that part of the city. 
The next word, translated “virgin,” is the Hebrew word, ALMAH עַלְמָה. As always, the context of the word determines its meaning.  If the word, in this case, referred to a young woman of marriageable age, who’d been recently married, which is a possible meaning of that word, would that have been a sign for Ahaz?  The context is clear.  This young woman is indeed a virgin, as we understand its meaning.  Only God can miraculously bring about a pregnancy in a young woman who isn’t sexually active.
     Pregnant, the Hebrew HAREH הָרֶה, means exactly that.  A virgin pregnancy is a miracle.  That goes without saying.  Remember that this is far removed from these days of medical interventions!  We’ll talk about the mechanics involved in this when we study the angel’s announcement to Mary of her impending pregnancy.  He said that the Holy Spirit would, “overshadow her…”
The next phrase: “who will call His name,” or “identify His personage as” is the Hebrew word, QARA קָרָא. “Immanuel” עִמָּנוּאֵל  means “God with us,” referring to, again, unmistakably to the humanity of our Lord Jesus Christ. This prophecy teaches that He is truly a member of the human race. This name in the Hebrew, one Name when transliterated into the English, teaches that Jesus Christ was to be totally unique, the unique God-Man of the universe.  There was to be, there never will be anyone like Him.  There is no salvation apart from the unique person of Jesus Christ. To quote Bob Thieme: “Christ is different from God in that He is Man, He is different from all members of the human race in that He is God and also perfect Man. Christ is unique.”  
The verse then reads as:
“Look, a virgin will be pregnant and bear a Son, and who will call His name ‘God With Us.”  
To continue with our context, Ahaz rejected this sign, the offer of salvation, so he’d be given another one, his own death warrant!  But that is not germane to today’s study.
Let’s take a quick break from this prophecy to understand why our Lord had to be true and completely human. Why did Jesus Christ who is eternal God have to become true humanity?  We’ll look at four reasons:
1.      He had to be true humanity to be our Savior. The Savior has to be a perfect man who will be the substitute for sinful man.
Therefore, since the children share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, Hebrews 2:14
2.   Jesus Christ had to be true humanity to be our mediator. A mediator must be equal with both parties in the mediation.  Jesus Christ is undiminished Deity and completely human. He is truly God and He is truly man!
For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 1 Timothy 2:5
3.   Christ had to be true humanity in order to be our High Priest forever after the order of Melchizedek. A priest is a man who represents man before God.
The Lord has sworn And will not change His mind, ‘You are a priest forever’ Hebrews 7:21
4. For our Lord to fulfill the Davidic covenant, as stated in 2 Samuel 7:8-16, He had to be completely human.  The Davidic covenant says that David will have a Son who will reign forever. The Lord Jesus Christ in His humanity is the Son of David. He had to be a literal Son of David in order to fulfill the Davidic Covenant.
Yet the Lord was not willing to destroy the house of David because of the covenant which He had made with David, and since He had promised to give a lamp to him and his sons forever. 2 Chronicles 21:7
Isaiah continued his message.  In the intervening chapters, between Isaiah 7:9 and this passage, his message built off of his sons’ names.  The message contains both encouragement and warnings of future judgments.  With this prophecy, he introduced a third Son, our Lord.

Isaiah 9:6
“For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; and the government will rest on His shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace."
Though they would be in darkness, being invaded and destroyed by the Assyrian army, they would have the opportunity to believe in the Lord, build upon their salvation to experience a much greater joy than the victorious Assyrians.  Their joy would be eternal in nature.  In this verse, Isaiah reveals more about the Child he prophesied concerning in the verse we just looked at.  The first line echoes 7:9 and builds upon it.
 This Child, “God with Us,” is to be both born to us and given to us. Being born indicates His true humanity, how He was to come into the world. Being given to us indicates His deity.  So in this phrase, Isaiah presents the fact of His being in Hypostatic Union, perfect humanity and undiminished Deity in one person.  “The government shall be upon his shoulder” is a prophecy about His Millennial rule. He is going to rule the world for 1000 years of perfect environment.
“His name shall be called, Wonderful-counselor [the two words go together].” What did this mean to Ahaz? What does it mean to us today?  Remember Isaiah was addressing Ahaz, really rubbing his nose into the ground because he was going to a demon possessed wizard. That wizard was Ahaz’ counselor! That’s why he bribed the King of Assyria to get him out of his pickle instead of following Isaiah’s leadership. Ahaz rejected the counsel of the Wonderful Counselor, the One, Jesus Christ. Ahaz rejected the wisdom of the wonderful counselor and took the whole country down with him.
God’s grace still reigned, in spite of Ahaz’s wrong decision.  The country which was in darkness received the light of Jesus Christ.   The principle: Out of cursing comes blessing.  “Mighty God” refers to Jesus Christ, the all-powerful God who is to have the governments of the world on His shoulder and is to rule and go to the cross.  The words, “Eternal Father” are a bit misleading. Jesus Christ is not God the Father as you may think those words state. The Hebrew reads “Father of Eternity.” He is Father,  in the sense that He is the Author of eternal life for us. Jesus Christ is the One who has provided eternal life; He is the author of eternal life, He is the origin of our eternal life.
“The Prince of Peace” means that he is the Prince of Reconciliation. Through His work, He opened the door to our reconciliation with the Father.  So, He is our peace.
and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven. Colossians 1:20

Micah 5:2
But as for you, Bethlehem Ephrathah, too little to be among the clans of Judah, from you One will go forth for Me to be ruler in Israel. His goings forth are from long ago, from the days of eternity.

 Micah, ministering at about the same time Isaiah did, gave this prophecy to Israel to let them know that despite their destruction, God’s plan would march on.  His message was much like Isaiah’s.  Though the people to whom Micah refers to here are about to suffer disciplinary destruction at the hands of the Assyrians, the Messiah would come from the remnant that survives.
First, why did Micah call this Bethlehem Ephrathah instead of just Bethlehem, Judah?  Though one reason was to differentiate it from the other Bethlehem in Zebulun, for reasons of geographic differentiation, Micah, inspired by the Holy Spirit, had another reason for identifying the city as Ephrathah.  Ephrathah was identified as this city in Gen 35:16-19:
Then they journeyed from Bethel; and when there was still some distance to go to Ephrath, Rachel began to give birth and she suffered severe labor. When she was in severe labor the midwife said to her, “Do not fear, for now you have another son.” It came about as her soul was departing (for she died), that she named him Ben-oni; but his father called him Benjamin. So Rachel died and was buried on the way to Ephrath (that is, Bethlehem). Genesis 35:16-19
That this very significant event occurred on the way to Bethlehem is very important.  While this passage describes Benjamin’s birth, Micah’s use of it further emphasizes that another birth is to occur in this city.  This new birth will be characterized by that name, Ephrathah, coming from the verb meaning, “to be fruitful.”  Its fruitfulness wasn’t to be limited to this one town but was to spread to the entire world in the Person of the Messiah!  That Micah used the masculine gender instead of the usual feminine gender to identify the city again indicates the fulfillment of its fruitfulness, again, in the Person of the Messiah.
Bethlehem Ephrathah was a little, insignificant village, so small that it was left off the roster of cities in Judah!  Yet from her would come the Son of God who would ultimately deliver Israel from her enemies, eternally. He is one who exists eternally.
“One who will go forth from Me” refers to God, not the prophet referring to himself. Everyone in Israel understood that it was God who always provided rulers for them, from Moses on.  The word, אֲנִי ny, translated, “me.” is a personal pronoun, usually used for emphasis.  The next phrase, “to be ruler in Israel,” refers to our Lord’s Millennial rule.   What a contrast this presents: from the lowliest, insignificant village will come One sent by God Himself.  Israel’s first king, David, Israel’s greatest king also came from humble origins.  
Two parallel Hebrew phrases in this verse are also important: “from ancient times or long ago,” from the Hebrew, קֶדֶם qě∙ěm and “days of eternity,” from the Hebrew עֹולָםʿô∙lām. While the first term, long ago, alone could refer to the earliest days of Israel, when combined with the term, eternity, it can only refer to existence prior to the existence of the human race, prior to God’s invention of time.  There is no stronger way to state this in Hebrew.  God’s sending the Messiah had been planned from eternity, so He existed before his human birth in Bethlehem.
This is, by no means, all of the prophecies concerning our Lord. In addition to these three, we will look at two prophecies which were given just prior to His birth, the two angel visitations to both Mary and Joseph.